Regarding Holechek and Briske, and Rebuttals by Teague

This article discusses reports authored by university researchers David Briske and Jerry Holechek that were critical of methods they had attributed to Allan Savory. It is shown that the Briske and Holechek mischaracterized Savory’s work and that, in fact, the types of trials they reviewed are precisely the type that Savory himself discourages.